NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
In the PassMark G3D benchmark the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 scores 1,011 against 1,005 for the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M, making it effectively tied with the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M.
The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M carries more video memory (2 GB against 1.5 GB), which matters at higher resolutions and for larger workloads.
The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M draws less board power (75 W against 150 W).
Measured as benchmark score per watt, the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is the more efficient of the two (13.4 against 6.7 points per watt).
Comparing 7 specifications that differ between these two cards. Coverage: 7/10 recorded for the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M, 6/10 for the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800. Fields neither card records are omitted; fields only one records are shown as "Not recorded".
Specifications compared
| NVIDIA Quadro 3000M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Shading units | 240 | 192 |
| Base clock | 450 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Memory size | 2 GB | 1.5 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Board power | 75 W | 150 W |
| Architecture | Fermi | Not recorded |
| Launch date | 2011-02-22 | 2008-11-11 |
| PassMark G3D | 1,005 | 1,011 |